…also
published in Daily Trust
Being
admittedly apathetic when it comes to voting, I can’t recall the last and only
occasion I voted in Nigeria, or even who I voted for, for that matter. Also,
having never happened to be in Nigeria during any election for over a decade, I
have not been in a position to vote in the first place. However, I have always hoped
for the victory of the relatively good candidates regardless of their partisan
affiliations.
Apparently,
my apathy towards voting is informed by an underlying assumption that there is
never any significant difference between most of the candidates vying for
various political offices, in terms of vision, competence and willingness to
deliver. After all, after two decades of alternation in power among them, only
a few of them have actually proved quite different in terms of real
achievements.
This
apathy is also apparently because of being under no particular pressure to vote,
unlike the case with tension-ridden ethnically and religiously heterogeneous societies
in Nigeria where ethno-religious communities are enmeshed in a perpetual power struggle
to outmaneuver each other through manipulation of census figures and election
results under a real or perceived threat of domination and persecution at the
hands of each other. Communities in Tafawa Balewa-Bogoro-Dass constituency in
Bauchi state, for instance, and other communities in some constituencies in,
say, Taraba, Plateau and Kaduna states can relate to that.
So, coming
from an ethnically and religiously homogeneous society (Kano) where such
tension and pressure never exist, and in view of the fact that the politicians
are basically of the same calibre when it comes to leadership qualities and
potential to deliver, I developed an apathy towards voting not minding who wins
or who loses in elections.
Interestingly,
though apathy to voting isn’t always wise especially when it’s likely to amount
to voter apathy that may give a victory on a
silver platter to the worse among the typically poor candidates, yet, the
assumption that one forfeits his right to hold leaders to account or criticize
them simply because he doesn’t vote is never justified either. After all, even
in developed democracies, voter turnout always fluctuates according to the
prevailing mood in the society at any given election, and a sizeable percentage
of people eligible to vote never or, at least, hardly vote.
Anyway,
if I were to vote in the forthcoming Nigerian elections, I would only vote in
the presidential election, and of course my vote would be for President Buhari while
hoping for the victory of the relatively good among the contenders contending for
other political offices. However, unlike a typical diehard Buhari loyalist, my
choice of Buhari is basically informed by the dilemma of having no better
alternative despite his failure to live up to expectations, as it’s obvious
that his main contender, Atiku Abubakar isn’t likely to maintain the modest
headway made by President Buhari, let alone build on it. With Atiku Abubakar
eyeing the presidency, the country faces the risk of being dragged back into the
era of systematic and indeed practically unhindered plunder of public
resources, which is being gradually eliminated with noticeable success under Buhari
administration. I elaborated my arguments in this regard in “A look into Nigerians’ assessments of Buhari administration” (Daily Trust, Friday, December
14, 2018).
Also,
with reference to this particular point, I add that, it’s a pity that the issue
of President Buhari’s performance, and whether he should or shouldn’t be
reelected has escalated to a raging point turning neighborhood majalisu,
joints and, of course, social media platforms into places of extremely heated
arguments and insult-trading resulting in the loss of many real-life and online
friendships among many people.
This
happens while the players in the power play, their respective family members,
relatives and close friends never allow their political differences to affect
the intactness of the underlying friendships and strategic interests that bind them
together. Being the actual stakeholders in the power play who in any case end
up disproportionately benefitting whether in power or in opposition, at the
expense of their respective followers, they only feign uncompromising
seriousness against their fellow elite political opponents, as the rules of the
game require.
While
they share neighborhoods peacefully in the most exclusive areas in Abuja, Lagos
and the states’ capitals, their respective followers are out there arguing
fiercely over them in the roadside majalisu of their mosquito-infested
slums and/or all over social media platforms. Also, while their respective
political heroes and their respective families and friends always run into one
another in local and international airports amid laughter and banter, or in the
streets of London, Dubai, New York and other cities around the world, many of
their respective diehard followers engaged in political thuggery can’t take a stroll
into some alleyways of their own slum neighborhoods considered the strongholds
of other thugs loyal to opposition politicians, for fear of an attack.
No comments:
Post a Comment