…also published in Daily Trust
There
has been an alarming escalation of tensions in the Arabian Gulf region over an
increasingly possible showdown between Iran and the United States. Though both
countries claim not to be interested in war, fears persist as the US, which
already maintains a cluster of military bases across the region continues to
deploy more warplanes and warships and other military hardware, while Iran
deploys boat-mounted missile launchers, units of anti-aircraft artillery and
other heavy-duty military equipment and weapons.
The
situation began to steadily deteriorate following the US unilateral withdrawal
from the 2015 nuclear deal between Iran and the P5+1 group of world powers i.e.
US, Russia, UK, China, France and Germany. Under the agreement, Iran agreed to
scale down its nuclear program in return for lifting the UN-imposed economic
sanctions on it.
Though
Russia and China are traditional allies of Iran, yet the deal wouldn’t have
been reached if not for the particular interest that the then Iran-friendly US
President Barack Obama showed in it. Equally, the influential pro-Iranian lobby
in Washington was hugely instrumental in securing the endorsement of US
Congress and other influential officials in the Obama administration.
Besides,
apparently many French, German and British manufacturing and service delivery
companies, which have always been eager to access Iranian markets with their
goods and services had equally lobbied their respective governments for the
deal.
However,
Arab countries particularly the Arabian Gulf states e.g. Saudi Arabia, UAE,
Bahrain and Kuwait were never comfortable with the deal. Having believed that
Iran is actually only hell-bent on obtaining a nuclear weapon to use it as a
tool to bully them into submission to its hegemony, they all along suspected a
hidden motive when not even a single Arab country was included in the deal
negotiation process.
They
also alleged that some terms of the deal were deliberately vaguely drafted to
allow Iran to obtain a nuclear weapon after ten years i.e. in 2025. Their
suspicions grew further when it was subsequently revealed that the parties to
the deal had reached an unwritten agreement to keep some terms of the deal
confidential. Interestingly, Arab countries accuse President Obama of being too
biased against them in their struggle against Iran’s hegemonic agenda in the
region.
Anyway,
following his withdrawal from the deal, President Trump imposed a ban on
Iranian oil exports then withdrew the temporary waivers he had granted to Japan,
India, China, Italy, Taiwan, Turkey, Greece and South Korea to buy Iranian oil,
even before the expiry of the waivers period. He also threatened to punish any
European company dealing with Iran by banning it in US markets.
President
Trump also maintains that for these sanctions to be lifted, Iran must agree to
renegotiate the nuclear deal, and comply with some twelve preconditions he
issued, which include the need for it to stop sponsoring its many terror groups
causing havoc across the Middle-East.
With
these measures, President Trump has deprived Iran of an opportunity to benefit
economically from the nuclear deal. Because obviously without Euro-American
technology, strategic industrial products and financial transaction platforms,
Iran cannot revive its crumbling economy. Its Russian and Chinese allies cannot
provide it with reliable alternatives.
Under
growing pressure, Iran threatens to close the strategic Strait of Hormuz, which
falls within its territorial waters, and through which more than one-third of
global crude oil supply passes. The current increased US military activities in
the region are designed to deter Iran from any attempt to obstruct vessel traffic
flow through the channel.
It’s,
however, important to note that America's established policy on Iran is to
never engage it in a full-scale war even though its military is obviously
strong enough to rout Iran’s military and overthrow its regime. The US
successive administrations over the decades have apparently allowed Iran to
continue threatening the rich Arabian Gulf countries, so as to keep them
feeling perpetually vulnerable and in need of US protection, which necessarily
means constant sales of the expensive US weapons and military hardware in the
region. However, with an anti-establishment and indeed unpredictable President
currently in the White House, no one can predict what would happen this time
around.
In
any case, unless President Trump decides to break this established policy, the
scenario of the looming US-Iran clash would only involve some US air and
ballistic missile strikes on some selected military targets and infrastructure
in some Iranian cities. Iran would equally fire missiles into Arabian Gulf
states especially UAE, Bahrain and Saudi Arabia, which is already vowing to retaliate.
Of course, Iran would also issue orders to its sponsored terror organizations
e.g. Hezbollah in Lebanon, Al-Hashd-al-sha’aby in Iraq, Fadimiyyoon in Syria
and Houthi in Yemen etc., to intensify their subversive attacks across the
region.
Iran
would also seek to attract Muslims’ sympathy through its propaganda techniques.
Many gullible Muslims would fall for it and pray for her victory. Whereas,
neither the United States nor Iran deserves Divine Victory in the looming war
between them, for it’s actually a war between two evil bullies, only that one
is suite-dressed and the other is turbaned, i.e. President Donald Trump of the
United States, and Ali Khamenei, the so-called Waliyyul-Faqeeh and
purported deputy of the fictitious Mahadi character, and the Supreme Leader of
Iran, respectively.
Because
while the former is hell-bent on consolidating America’s global economic and
military hegemony, the latter is relentlessly pursuing a neo-Persian hegemonic
agenda deceitfully disguised in Islamic clothing, with a view to bringing all
Arab and Muslim countries under the control of the theocratic dictatorship of
Wiliyatul-Faqeeh. In a war of this nature, the stronger always prevails.
No comments:
Post a Comment