…also published in Daily Trust
Since the 2015
Army-Shiite bloody confrontation in Zaria, and the detention of the Shiites’
leader, Ibrahim Zakzaky; he has attracted many unsolicited apologists who
portray him as a victim of systematic persecution at the hands of successive
federal and various state governments in Nigeria over the past forty years.
This, however,
isn’t particularly interesting; after all, a controversial person would always
attract unsolicited apologists among the attention-seeking and other equally
controversial individuals and groups.
The interesting
thing instead is how his most enthusiastic apologists are individuals and
groups whose interests and his mission are inherently irreconcilable and indeed
mutually exclusive. Many of them, for instance, are unrepentant anti-Muslim
individuals and groups who have always been particularly notorious for peddling
Islamophobic propaganda including the unfounded narrative of an Islamization
agenda clandestinely pursued by northern Nigerian political establishment
purportedly to Islamize Nigeria. His other apologists are equally notorious for
advocating the breakaway of their regions from Nigeria or getting rid of the
north to end the country’s corporate existence.
Yet, even
though Zakzaky has never disguised his purported “Islamic” agenda through which
he seeks to turn Nigeria into an “Islamic” state in an Iran-inspired
revolution, his anti-Muslim apologists not only pretend to ignore this fact,
but in fact, they insist that he has always been peaceful in pursuit of his
mission, insisting also that he is never motivated by any subversive political
agenda.
They dominate
mainstream and social media with propaganda on why he should not only be
released unconditionally but should also be allowed to carry on his activities.
They peddle a grossly distorted narrative on the history of his activities to
portray him as a law-abiding and peace-loving religious leader, ignoring the
miserable experiences the people of northern Nigeria have endured for decades
at his hands. Obviously, not only grossly hypocritical, this inconsistency
reveals much more sinister motives on the part of those anti-Muslim Zakzaky
apologists.
To figure out
the apparent motive behind this inconsistency, it’s important to note that
having apparently realized the fact that Zakzaky actually never poses any
strategic threat to non-Muslim interests in the country, and that he is, in
reality, out to subjugate and subject Muslim-dominated northern Nigeria to the
control of the so-called Waliyyul-Faqeeh in Tehran, with him (i.e. Zakzaky) as
his resident representative, of course, his anti-Muslim apologists
capitalize on the situation to indirectly support his subversive activities to
further undermine the region, render it irreversibly destabilized, and indeed
leave it to the mercy of others to decide its fate in the federation or
the fate of the federation as a whole for that matter.
Likewise, many
“secularist Muslims” who, though have always advocated the complete elimination
of Islamic sanctions and injunctions from worldly affairs have suddenly turned
unsolicited Zakzaky apologists, pretending to ignore his “Islamic”
revolutionary agenda. Even the self-proclaimed human right activists among them
including the so-called humanists and feminists sound as though they never know
how Zakzaky has over the decades perpetrated gross human right violations
against the general public including his followers who he has subjected to
slavery-like exploitation to satisfy his ego. Besides, though instances of such
violations are pervasive in his activities, his “secularist Muslims”
unsolicited apologists hardly cite, let alone condemn any instance in their
writings and speeches.
To understand
the underlying motive behind this contradiction, it should be looked at in its
right context. Obviously, most of the “secularist Muslims” in Nigeria never
disguise their extreme hatred towards the wholehearted Muslims, otherwise known
as the Salafists, who believe in the universality and perpetual applicability
of all Islamic teachings as contained in the Qur’an and the authentic Sunnah
according to the perception of the Salaf i.e. the Sahaba and those who stuck to
their way among the succeeding generations.
This hatred is
particularly manifested on social media where such “secularist Muslims” oppose
almost everything Islamic, ridicule Islamic teachings, mock Islamic scholars,
peddle the orientalist interpretations of Islamic teachings to suit their
worldly desires and confuse Muslim laypersons. They perpetrate all these to
bully the Islamic scholars into abandoning their mission of preaching against
moral decadence, which the “secularist Muslims” regard as a direct threat to the
survival of their relevance in an increasingly religious society that loses
respect for unrepentant morally corrupt public figures and potential leaders.
Those
“secularist Muslims” have therefore turned Zakzaky apologists only to spite the
Salafists for being been particularly enthusiastic in preaching against moral
decadence, which the secularists are hell-bent on promoting in Muslim
communities. Besides, even when a public commentator among those “secularist
Muslims” acknowledges some instances of Zakzaky’s transgression against the
constituted authorities and the general public, as some of them reluctantly
albeit quite subtly do sometimes when confronted with superior arguments, he
would still somehow drag in the Salafists to apportion a portion, if not most,
of the blame on them.
Similarly, many
Sufi public commentators have turned Zakzaky apologists to equally spite the
Salafists for being particularly vigorous in refuting Sufist, and of course
Shiite, heretical ideologies and ritual practices that have been developed over
the centuries to undermine Islamic religion.
No comments:
Post a Comment