(Link on Daily Trust
site)
There is a popular but simplistic assumption especially
among Nigerians interested in the Middle East politics that Iran and Saudi
Arabia are locked in a protracted geopolitical power struggle. This is obvious
from most of the analyses churned out by both the presumably well-informed observers
and the barely informed media audience who, either due to language constraints
or limited means, cannot access sufficient amount of relevant information and
exhaustive analyses on the topic and the region’s geopolitics at large.
However, contrary to that assumption, the forty-year-old
tensions between Iran and Saudi Arabia are never linked to any geopolitical power
struggle. After all, a geopolitical power struggle necessarily involves two or
more regional countries with expansionist ambitions and locked in a struggle
for regional supremacy at the expense of one another.
It’s important to note that the Saudi Kingdom was
founded by King Abdul-Aziz Al-Saud in 1932, while the Iranian theocracy was
created in 1979 following the Khomeini-led revolution, which means that the
Kingdom had been there as a sovereign state for forty-seven years before the
creation of the Iranian theocracy. And throughout that period, the only source
of tensions in the region was the Zionists continuous occupation of Palestinian
territories, which eventually culminated in the creation of the State of Israel
in 1948. Even the struggle between the Arab nationalists backed by Jamal
Abdun-Nasir of Egypt and the Islamists backed by King Faisal of Saudi Arabia never
involved any expansionist dimension in favour or against any particular country
in the region.
However, when, in 1979, it began to appear that
the then newly created Iranian theocracy was out to export its revolution to
all Muslim countries in the region with a view to overthrowing their respective
governments and replacing them with governments allegiant to Khomeini, its Supreme
Leader then, regional tensions began to form and indeed kept raising as Iran
continued to systematically propagate its revolutionary slogan of “Tasdeerus-thaura”
i.e. export of revolution across the region.
Interestingly, and quoting from a previous article
of mine, “Iran is arguably the only country that blatantly
claims a self-accorded entitlement to bringing all Muslim countries under the
sole control of its Supreme Theocrat i.e. the
so-called Waliyyul-faqeeh who is currently Ali Khamenei. This is
because, according to the ideology, the Waliyyul-faqeeh is the
Mahdi’s Deputy who therefore is inherently entitled to rule over the whole
Muslim world in anticipation of the emergence of Mahdi who they believe had
gone into hiding almost one thousand two hundred years ago; and that he would
emerge from his hiding place to rule over the whole world. By the way, this
Mahdi character is actually fictitious, unlike the yet-to-be-born authentic
Mahdi in standard Muslims narratives.” (Iran: A threatened theocracy, Daily Trust,
Nov. 22, 2019.)
Anyway, since then Iran has been hell-bent on
achieving this agenda using sectarian manipulation and emotive but empty revolutionary
rhetoric to impress and turn many otherwise intelligent observers into its
unsolicited apologists, and indeed turn many gullible folks into its puppets who
are committed to bringing their respective countries under its control. It even
created a whole military unit i.e. the so-called Quds Force for the purposes of
creating, training, financing, arming and coordinating the operations of
militias allegiant to Iran in all Muslim countries in the region and beyond. Until his recent assassination by the US,
General Qasem Soleimani was the unit’s commander for more than twenty years.
Iran’s first two major targets were Iraq and Saudi
Arabia for obvious reasons. Because the former was at that time the strongest
Arab country militarily, while the latter was/is the focal point of the Muslim
world being the custodian of two of the three holy cities in Islam. While Iran
sought to conquer Iraq militarily, which resulted in the eight-year-long war between
them that ended in 1988, it has been trying to foment sectarian strife in Saudi
Arabia to manipulate the Shiite minority in the Kingdom and cause the Kingdom’s
collapse. It has also always sought to instigate uncontrollable chaos during
Hajj to capitalize on it in pursuit of its agenda against the Kingdom.
However, in Lebanon, the post-2003 Iraq, Yemen and
Syria, Iran’s puppet militias e.g. Hezbollah, Al-Hasdush’sha’aby and others,
Houthi, Hezbollah and Abul-Fadl-Al-Abbas and others, respectively, which,
having grown effectively stronger than their respective governments, have been
holding their respective countries to ransom on behalf of Iran.
Iran also manipulates the power-hungry elite
members of the Muslim Brotherhood and its affiliates like Hamas in Gaza, to
sustain feud among the Palestinians under the disguise of supporting armed
resistance against the Zionist occupation, which enables it to discreetly
pursue its real agenda. It equally maintains other allegiant groups in many
other countries promoting its agenda at the expense of their respective
countries.
It’s also noteworthy that, throughout the almost
five decades between the creation of the Saudi Kingdom in 1932 and the
emergence of the Iranian theocracy in 1979, there was no such thing as
Shiite-Sunni sectarianism in the Middle East whatsoever. However, soon
afterwards, Iran embarked on systematic and sustained incitement of Shiite-Sunni
sectarianism to infiltrate countries in the region thereby undermining social cohesion
and instigating chaos across the Muslim world over the decades.
Therefore, the purported Iran-Saudi geopolitical
power struggle is simply a myth, hence any analysis on its basis is
fundamentally flawed. In reality, it’s simply a situation whereby Iran is hell-bent
on bringing Saudi Arabia under the control of the Iranian Supreme Leader. After
all, Saudi Arabia is only a target among many other Iran’s targets in its
expansionist agenda; only that it’s the most important target. All Iran’s subversive
activities in Lebanon, Iraq and, of course, Yemen and other places are designed
to ultimately culminate in its control of Makkah, Medina and the Arabian Peninsula
at large, which Saudi Arabia rightly resists.
3 comments:
I love your write ups especially on the Middle East,You clear lots of grey areas that have kept us so long in the dark. Jazakumullahu Khairan
Thanks for your intervention as always Sir. Your knowledge of middle east politics is the knowledge we drink 2 quench our thirst. May Almighty Allah continue to bless you & may Aljannatul Firdaus be your abode!!!
جزاك الله خيرًا
Post a Comment