(Link on DailyTrust site)
The recent
riots in the United States against the brutal killing of one George Floyd, an
African American, by a White police officer, have once again highlighted not
only the plight of the Black community in the country but also the persistent
issue of racism against the Black race the world over.
Basically,
people of all races consciously or subconsciously discriminate against people
of other races in different subtle and blatant ways. However, the question of whether
a particular race is more racist than the other remains debatable in the
absence of any objective and exhaustive research in this regard. Yet, judging
by the socio-cultural and tacit institutional recognition of racist attitudes
and actions, countries of the Euro-American axis may appear more racist than
others. This is, among other things, given the prevalence of unapologetic White
supremacist groups, which blatantly push for preferential consideration for
people of Caucasian origin i.e. the White on account of their race.
While their thugs
are notorious for racially-motivated crimes, nationalist politicians effectively
represent the political front of the racist tendency. With whole parties of
their own or as influential members in other parties, they partake in politics
and indeed win elections. They are likewise all over the public and private
sectors and the security establishments of those countries.
This explains
why the Black is subjected to racial profiling in the Euro-American axis
probably worse than anywhere else. The basic principle of the presumption of the
innocence of an individual until proved guilty largely applies the other way
round there when a Black person is involved. It’s quite common, for instance,
for a Black dude innocently strolling into or around a typical White
neighbourhood in, say, Los Angeles, to attract a phobic suspicion from the
residents and even interrogation from the police patrol around simply because,
being Black, automatically makes him a potential suspect until somehow proved
otherwise.
Likewise, a typical Black fellow in a typical shopping store is
viewed as a potential shoplifter, and is covertly or even overtly monitored by
the store attendants. Even in George Floyd’s murder case that sparked the
recent riots in the US, the store attendant involved was said to have suspected
the victim of presenting a counterfeit $20 bill to buy a cigarette and
therefore reported to the police who responded with their typical racist-motivated
high-handedness when a Black man is involved.
In the
Indo-Chinese axis also, the persistent racist-motivated harassment against the
Black, which recurrently escalates into indiscriminate violence against African
communities and individuals has exposed the hitherto largely unknown but
deep-rooted Indo-Chinese anti-Black racism. In India particularly, there is a pre-existing
culture of discrimination against the relatively darker-skinned Indians. The
situation has also got worse for other vulnerable Indian communities since the
beginning of the current nationalist government in the country under Prime
Minister, Narendra Modi, a notorious Hindu chauvinist.
Arabs equally
exhibit anti-Black racism in various ways. Their racism, however, is more of an
individual tendency than an institutional or communal phenomenon, as it’s the
case elsewhere. Interestingly also, Arabs are, ironically, more obsessed with their
deep-rooted culture of clannism, which is a persistent residue of their
pre-Islamic Jahiliyya culture, and which still effectively partly determines clannish
and individual social status. This explains the failure of Arab nationalism
championed by the likes of Jamal Abdul-Nasir of Egypt, and others. However, while
this may not necessarily suggest less anti-Black racism, it explains their
relatively less obsession with it, which, in turn, explains their relatively
less aggressive show of racism against the Black at least compared to the
foregoing.
Now, though
critics of racism against the Black are typically and rightly passionate in
their criticisms, their largely simplistic perception of the phenomenon renders
their anti-racism recommendations too unrealistic and indeed too idealistic to
be adopted. They ignore the basic fact that anti-Black racism is a universal
phenomenon; and that no race, including the Black themselves, is innocent in
this regard.
Interestingly, while
the non-Black races discriminate against the Black as exemplified in the
foregoing, the Black betray anti-Black discrimination mostly in the form of
subconscious glorification of the White and their choices and subtle
preference for the relatively lighter-skinned among themselves. In fact, some
even get carried away sometimes to sound or behave worse than the White racists.
For instance, a
particularly darker-skinned Black fellow is more likely to be mischievously taunted for
his complexion in say, Nigeria, than in, say, Norway. He is also more likely to
be discriminated against in a competitive environment in Nigeria on account of
his ethnicity than he is in, say, Australia on account of his race.
Likewise,
despite the notoriety of the US police for racist-motivated high-handedness
against the Black, a typical law-abiding but less-privileged Nigerian is much
more vulnerable to police harassment, brutality, and, of course, extortion in
the streets of Kano than he is in the streets of Kansas.
In short,
whatever discrimination a typical Black fellow endures in any non-Black country
on account of his race is less than what his typical African-based counterpart
endures on account of his ethnicity.
Anyway,
anti-Black racism is obviously borne out of deep-rooted racial stereotypes of
the Black who are looked down on as less intelligent, less competent and less
civilized compared to other races, which many attribute to genetic factors
claiming that the Black race is naturally genetically disadvantaged
intelligence-wise. However, while this claim is absolutely ridiculous as it
contradicts the spirit of Divine Impartiality, it’s admittedly not easy to
outargue its theorists in the absence of any instance in human existence where
the Black race, in general, has ever matched up to, let alone outmatch, any
non-Black race as a whole in any competitive human endeavour.
Legal
injunctions, policies and other relevant measures can only address anti-Black
racism superficially; also, while absolute commitment to relevant moral values
remains the only permanent panacea for the phenomenon, the Black as a whole can
only acquire appropriate recognition among other races according to the extent
of their collective competitiveness in all competitive human ventures.
No comments:
Post a Comment