Also published in
Daily Trust
Ever since the arrest of Dr Muhammad
Nazeef Yunus of Kogi State University a couple of weeks ago by the State
Security Service (SSS) operatives, over alleged link to the Boko Haram terror
gang, many Muslim scholars and a couple of Islamic organizations, including
Jama’atu Nasrul-Islam (JNI) have rightly dismissed the charge against him,
affirmed his innocence and called for his immediate release.
The purported evidence given by the SSS
for his arrest was utterly ridiculous, to say the least. According to the SSS
he was implicated by some suspected members of the terror group, who allegedly
claimed that they were his disciples.
Interestingly enough, in a time when it
takes exceptional courage to openly challenge Boko Haram’s religious
misconceptions, and in a time when only a few Muslim scholars have the courage
to publically condemn that ideology apparently for fear of their lives, Dr
Nazeef has always been particularly firm on his stand against it. He also
maintains the same stand in his PhD thesis, as translated from Arabic to
English for Weekly Trust by Dr Muhammad Mansur Sokoto last Saturday.
Some Muslim scholars lost their lives
for their stand against Boko Haram, because they rightly believed that, unless
the militants are intellectually engaged by qualified Muslim scholars, who can
counter their religious misconceptions with better and superior theological and
jurisprudential arguments, the crisis would remain difficult, if not
impossible, to tackle, no matter how much force is used. For instance, the
circumstances surrounding the assassination of late Sheikh Ja’afar Mahmoud
Adam, who was particularly critical against them, bore the hallmarks of Boko
Haram militants.
Nevertheless and though quite aware of
this risk, Dr Nazeef lives up to his moral and religious responsibility by
warning against that ideology anyway. Yet, this unfortunately could not save
him from the recklessness of the unintelligent Nigeria’s security intelligence
service and indeed the whole government, which instead of encouraging him chose
to effectively undermine his efforts. Though I never expected the
government to encourage him in his efforts, having realized its lack of
seriousness and focus, yet I never suspected that it would go to the extent of
victimizing him, either.
Meanwhile, the unjustified and shameful
silence of human right activists and organizations in the country, and their
failure to live up to their moral responsibilities over Dr Nazeef’s ordeal has
further exposed their hypocrisy. Muslim activists among them are particularly
guilty in this regard, for they apparently fear that, due to the nature of the
charges against him they may unnecessarily expose themselves to the suspicion
of being somehow involved or at least sympathetic to the course of religious
extremism and terrorism.
Besides, being largely secular-minded,
the majority of such Muslim human right activists are actually too timid to
rise up in defence of victimized Muslims on issues of this nature, in the first
place. Therefore, being not only a Muslim scholar but also a dedicated Da’awah
activist with a particular interest in reviving the core Islamic ideological
values and teaching as contained in noble Qur’an and the authentic Prophetic
Sunnah, as understood by earlier Muslim generations, Dr Nazeef is not the kind
of person whose rights matter to the majority of Nigerian human right
activists.
Besides, they probably assume that,
working in defence of people like Dr Nazeef may undermine their “reliability”
in the eyes of their European and American-based counterparts and sponsors,
hence it may affect the amount of financial and other forms of support they get
from them.
Ironically however, many a time, these
European and American-based organizations are even more objective in their
approach to the plight of persecuted Muslims. For instance, despite the concerted
and systematic campaign of calumny against Islam and the victimization of
millions of innocent Muslims all over the world particularly over the last
fourteen years or so, there have been many instances when some European and
American-based human right organizations indentified several cases of Muslim
victimization, mobilized huge public sympathy for them and/or successfully
engaged governments in legal actions that ended, or at least substantially
eased their ordeals.
In any case, I am sure if Dr Nazeef were
an opportunistic politician who has lost out in power struggle and pretended to
turn into a fraudulent anti-corruption activist, the media would have been
saturated with condemnation from various human right organizations and
activists calling for his immediate and unconditional release. The public would
have also resonated accordingly.
Similarly if he were one of those
imposters who disguise as human right activists just to climb the ladder to
social relevance or cling to their already ill-gotten socio-political
recognition, his ordeal would have attracted the condemnation of the
like-minded opportunists across the country, and would have equally attracted
enough public sympathy to push for his release.
I therefore suppose that the largely
self-acclaimed human activists in Nigeria are now waiting for their principals
in Europe and America to take note of Dr Nazeef’s ordeal and begin to call for
his release before they also follow suit.
Government should note that, while this kind of injustice renders the victims
soft targets for extremists to easily take advantage of their acute frustration
to indoctrinate and radicalize them, it also discourages those likely to play
important roles in addressing the crisis from making any effort in this regard.
Dr Nazeef should therefore be immediately and unconditionally released.
No comments:
Post a Comment