Also
published in Daily Trust
When the “military kingmakers”
who had brought General Muhammad Buhari to power abruptly ended his rule in
another military coup in 1985, Nigerians had already come a long way in
adjusting to the new order of social discipline his regime had introduced and
vigorously promoted.
Nevertheless his overthrow was
greeted with indifference, and even cheers, by a significant portion of a
largely gullible populace who, having been used to the culture of chaos and
social indiscipline over the decades, had regarded the new social order under
Buhari/Idiagbon regime as being too harsh. Of course, the beneficiaries of the
status quo among the notoriously corrupt politicians, their associates in
public service and private sector, as well as their business associates, also
greeted his overthrow with jubilation.
However, when the ensuing
degeneration caused by the subsequent military and civilian regimes, which also
gave rise to the culture of institutionalized corruption of monumental
magnitude in the land began to take an unprecedented dimension, while its
attendant widespread economic frustration, confusion and despair got worse,
Nigerians began to realize that corruption was the only cause of all the
country’s problems, and that only an honest leader could salvage the nation.
Therefore, following what
appeared to be an intense pressure and lobbying, Buhari reluctantly decided to
join politics and join the presidential race, while having already been widely
and rightly believed to be honest and incorruptible, his reputation and
popularity continued to grow particularly among the ordinary Nigerians.
Unfortunately however, he fell
into the hands of unscrupulous political opportunists many of whom had been
wallowing in political obscurity or irrelevance before they benefitted
immensely from his popularity to win elections at various levels of government
and indeed rise to political prominence, only to eventually betray and abandon
him.
Besides, despite his wide
experience in governance, having held different political positions including
Head of State, during his military career, and even though the game of politics
is inherently intrigue-ridden, no one denied or underestimated Buhari’s dilemma
for having to operate in Nigeria’s political terrain, which is particularly
messy, and indeed for having to work with Nigerian politicians most of whom are
simply there in order to achieve their selfish interests, which they have
always pursued and achieved at the expense of the long-suffering ordinary
Nigerians.
Yet, Buhari’s political
predicament has been particularly due to the apparent incompetence of his handlers
whose inexcusable blunders have been responsible for his failure to achieve his
political ambition, and are also responsible for his seemingly declining
political fortune even within his traditional political stronghold.
Vested interests and other individuals
who are particularly against his presidential ambition have over the past
several years worked relentlessly and have, to a large extent, succeeded in
painting and portraying him as a villain of a sort, and as an ethno-religious
and regional bigot who also lacks the necessary qualities to win majority
support nationwide to become president.
Moreover, his obviously
incompetent media and public relation handlers, who have failed to effectively
counter the systematic and sustained campaign of calumny against him by such
vested interests, have, in effect, been partly responsible for the spread of
anti-Buhari sentiment, which those vested interests have deliberately created
and promoted particularly among the non- Muslim communities in the country.
Also, in view of how his
reputation has easily and recurrently been exploited by fake political allies
for their personal interests, and considering the persistent strategic blunders
and inconsistency that define some of his political strategies, one can confidently
conclude that his political strategists, advisers and analysts are simply not
competent enough to handle his political project.
For instance, the potentially
divisive feud currently brewing in All Progressives Congress (APC) over some
credible leaks that the party is considering the idea of pairing him, as
presidential candidate, with Bola Tinubu as vice president, is a yet another
political miscalculation by his handlers, which could not only cost him his
presidential ambition but probably deal the final blow to whatever is left of
his political adventure, age being an important factor.
Incidentally, notwithstanding
whether Tinubu is a suitable candidate for the post of vice president or not,
and even though theoretically speaking, political parties are expected to field
the best candidates regardless of any other considerations, this is not the
case in reality even in the most advanced democracies. Other factors,
which are theoretically irrelevant, are nonetheless considered in order to address
some specific expectations of the electorate.
Therefore in a sharply polarized
and tension-ridden Nigerian society, which increasingly cracks along
ethno-religious and regional divides, it does not require any intricate
political calculation to realize the foolishness (politically speaking) of the
idea to field a duo from the same religious, ethnic or regional background for
the posts of president and vice president.
The boring excuse i.e. the
Abiola/Kingibe presidential ticket in 1993, which is repeatedly cited by those
behind this idea, is simply no longer relevant in Nigeria, because of the huge
changes that have taken place since then, which have also hugely changed the
pattern and equation of political alliance between country’s ethno-religious
and regional components.
Therefore, considering the
obvious ridiculousness of this idea in Nigeria’s political context, and how
Buhari’s handlers seem to deliberate overlook its damaging effect on his
presidential ambition, one can suspect that there are some infiltrators within
the party’s hierarchy, or at least within the circle of Buhari’s handlers, who
undermine his presidential ambition. After all, the current gradual but
seemingly persistent setbacks suffered by the party may not be completely
unconnected with such possible undercover elements.
No comments:
Post a Comment