Also published in Daily Trust
Though many countries struggle with Boko Haram-like
terrorism, the recent exploits by some gallant vigilantes of local hunters and ‘yan tauri against Boko Haram terrorists
underscore the peculiarity of the situation in Nigeria and also highlight the
urgent need to explore effective local strategies to combat Boko Haram
insurgency.
Similarly, the growing public support for the idea of
involving ‘yan tauri and local
hunters in the ongoing fight against Boko Haram reflects Nigerians’
disappointment and lack of confidence in the ability of the Nigerian Army to
tackle the insurgents.
After all, Governor Bala James Ngilari of Adamawa state
has announced his government’s plan to recruit at least10, 000 local hunters
and other volunteers as vigilantes to help recapture the towns captured by Boko
Haram in the state. Moreover, the highly revered Emir of Kano, Mohammad Sunusi
II has also advised people not rely on the military anymore, and to, instead,
protect themselves against the terror attacks of Boko Haram terrorists.
To be fair however, being one of the leading institutions
of the decaying, if not already decayed, Nigerian state, the Nigerian
military’s persistent decline is largely due to the sheer corruption pervading
the institution where massive amounts of money meant for the welfare of the
armed forces and the procurement of weapons and other military equipment and
hardware are simply plundered, which results in a gradual deterioration of the
combat readiness of the country’s armed forces and indeed explains their
embarrassing failure to tackle a ragtag gang of mere young and primitive,
though recklessly audacious, terrorists.
In any case, it is imperative to exercise extreme caution
in involving ‘yan tauri and local
hunters in the fight against the increasingly lethal Boko Haram terrorists, as
there should also be strict guidelines and regulations to regulate individual
and communal self-defence strategies against the terrorists, so as to avoid,
unknowingly, creating yet another bloody dimension to the lingering crisis.
Obviously under this fragile security situation and in the
absence of strict regulatory measures, many violent gangs would easily take
advantage of the chaos likely to result from the rush to form vigilantes
against Boko Haram, in order to commit crimes against individuals and
communities. In other words, a chaotic formation of vigilantes and
proliferation of arms among people would further undermine the already delicate
security situation across the region and the whole country.
After all, just as some mischievous vested interests have
capitalized on Boko Haram crisis to execute their self-centred agendas in
disguise, the same vested interests and indeed many more would exploit the
situation to perpetuate their evil plots. Likewise, the recurrent communal
clashes in the region may further escalate while many other areas suffering
from recurring ethno-religious violence may descend into further chaos.
Besides, the highly organized armed bandits who raid
communities and nomadic settlements to kill the people and herd hundreds of
their livestock would simply find this situation even more conducive to carry
out their criminal activities with impunity. Also, any unregulated permission
for individuals to keep and bear arms ostensibly for the purpose of
self-defence against Boko Haram would also give many criminals the pretext they
need to illegally bear arms to harass individuals.
To avoid these situations, towns, villages and communities
that are particularly vulnerable to Boko Haram raids should organize themselves
and form community patrol vigilantes among the heroic and law-abiding members
of their communities. This should however be under strict communal supervision.
In any case however, it should be noted that, vigilantism
as a strategy to counter Boko Haram is not a sustainable solution and should
not be considered so, either. This is notwithstanding the efficacy or otherwise
of the vigilantes’ purported bulletproof amulets and hostile fire-neutralizing
charms, which are in reality too unreliable to be relied upon in confrontation
with the heavily-armed and increasingly sophisticated Boko Haram terrorists.
Interestingly enough, the general belief that the ‘yan tauri and the other vigilantes who
recently recaptured some towns from Boko Haram insurgents were able to do so
due to the sheer efficacy of their charms, which was said to have neutralized
all the guns used by Boko Haram fighters during the encounters, was simply
superstitious, to say the least. After all, if it had been that easy, I am sure
the insurgency would have been crushed long ago.
The reality is that, even if the vigilantes were not
supported by the military during the encounters, the most reasonable conclusion
is that, they were able to defeat the terrorists on those encounters due to the
sheer bravery the displayed, which was inspired by the motivation they probably
got in the process of forming and organizing them. Whatever was the case
however, they must have used conventional weapons and employed conventional
combat tactics in the process.
By the way, despite the persistent inadequacy of sophisticated
weaponry supplies suffered by the Nigerian soldiers on the war fronts and the
sometimes exaggerated Boko Haram weapons superiority, it is actually the lack
of adequate motivation and inspiration on the part of Nigerian soldiers that
affects their morale and combat readiness, which inevitably impacts on their
performance on the fronts and indeed causes their recurrent and embarrassing
defeats at the hands of Boko Haram terrorists.
Though I can understand the amount of frustration and
desperation behind the growing popularity of the idea of resorting to ‘yan tauri in the fight against Boko
Haram, pressure should be sustained on the federal government to live up to its
responsibility of protecting the lives and properties of Nigerians and indeed
ending the Boko Haram crisis. After all, the forthcoming elections provide a
timely opportunity to vote out the government altogether.
No comments:
Post a Comment