(Link on Daily Trust site)
After global adoption of lockdown as
one of the recommended measures to prevent and contain the spread of the
COVID-19 virus, and despite the growing number of new cases and fatalities
across the world, there is a steadily growing trend of reopening of business
activities anyway, which makes many folks wonder its logical explanation as there
is still no substantive medication against the virus.
Countries have adopted the lockdown
measure to various extents depending on the magnitude of their respective
afflictions or exposure to the virus. Cities across the world have been
completely or largely deserted with social media awash with pictures and video
clips of hitherto bustling cities literally reduced to ghost cities.
Meanwhile, the pandemic-triggered
economic losses continue to pile up at a rate too uncontrollable to allow for
counting the losses for now; efforts are currently focused on minimizing the
mounting losses. Also, the updates on the ongoing efforts to develop
appropriate medication and vaccine against the virus remain barely encouraging
while forecasts on its persistence and its implications on the recovery
potential of the global economy in the aftermath of the pandemic remain gloomy.
This situation represents a huge
source of worry and desperation to the shapers, or rather dictators, of the
global economic trends who have concluded that the world cannot afford a strict
lockdown any longer, and have, therefore, decided to embark on gradual
reopening though in a strictly regulated fashion ostensibly to avoid
compromising the recommended preventive and containment measures in place,
which can be somehow observed without prejudice to business activities.
President Donald Trump of the United
States has all along particularly advocated this strategy, albeit quite
tacitly; and even though he might be seen as too insensitive, he actually
represents the attitudes of other world powers. After all, the strategy is
absolutely consistent with the general trends in today’s hyper-capitalist and
hyper-materialistic world where literally nothing, including human life, is
considered too valued to be measured on profit/loss scale.
However, though the lockdown has
been quite effective in infrastructurally functioning and economically stable
countries with dutiful citizens, for which the measure was apparently intended
in the first place, it represents a huge dilemma in countries deficient in this
regard.
Nigeria as a typical instance has
blindly adopted the measure without introducing appropriate measures to ensure
its success in the face of the country’s gross infrastructural deficiencies, self-inflicted
socio-economic constraints and the characteristic attitudes of the vast
majority of its people.
In the absence of any creative and
realistic lockdown enforcement measures that consider those constraints, a
lockdown in Nigeria remains tantamount to forcefully confining crowds of
largely desperate folks living hand to mouth to their already overcrowded
inner-city slums, impoverished urban ghettoes and shantytowns where it’s simply
impossible to observe appropriate preventive instructions. Instead, it has
certainly caused avoidable further transmission of the virus within
communities, which also worsens the situation once the lockdown is suspended or
lifted when people throng and overcrowd marketplaces, banks, shopping centres
and other public places.
This vicious circle is believed to
be responsible for the alarming rise in the number of new cases of the virus
and indeed the “mysterious” mass deaths currently witnessed in Kano and other
states. Besides, experts and observers are warning of a human catastrophe, God
ford, in the event of the persistence of the pandemic given the sheer
leadership-inflicted vulnerability of the people in that part of the
world.
Now, on top of all the
counterproductive impacts of blindly following the lockdown trend, Nigerian
authorities, which have already been inconsistent in the lockdown, will almost
certainly soon join the growing global reopening trend, and indeed handle the
situation without considering its peculiar challenges and circumstances to end
up rendering it equally counterproductive.
By the way, this represents a
typical instance of, particularly, Sub Saharan African educated/political
elites’ characteristic lack of intellectual creativity. Though
educated/political elites in developing countries hardly see beyond the
“standard” textbook theories and policies in addressing their respective
countries’ socio-economic and political challenges due to persistent underlying
colonial influence, Sub Saharan African educated/political elites, including Nigerians,
are particularly uncreative in this regard.
In ambitious developing countries in
other parts of the world, educated/political elites always come up with
innovative policies and/or introduce appropriate modifications to
foreign-originated policies and measures to suit their respective
socio-economic, cultural and political circumstances. Whereas, in Sub Saharan
Africa, mastering the colonial languages e.g. English and French; and
memorizing some obsolete and abstract theories and “intimidating” names of
ancient European theorists and philosophers remain largely the yardsticks of
measuring individuals’ intellectual capabilities.
Anyway, as gradual reopening
continues across the world despite a lack of any reliable reassurance on the
availability of medication against it or when the pandemic would likely end,
it’s obvious that the world is adjusting to living with it. Personal and
collective protective and preventive measures are being introduced everywhere
in a way suggesting that the situation might last for an extended period.
Besides, policies, systemic operational procedures and protocols are being
adjusted the world over to suit the circumstances of a possible persistence of
the pandemic.
While it’s hoped that some stability
in the global system would be restored that way while efforts to develop
substantive medication against the virus continue, it’s feared that the “copy
and paste” approach of some vulnerable countries, e.g. Nigeria, could cost it
too much to bear, God forbid.
No comments:
Post a Comment