A look into insurgent groups in Nigeria

Obviously, Nigeria’s already fragile national cohesion is bedevilled by persistent challenges that have escalated into real existential threats to the country, on at least two occasions. On the first occasion, the country experienced a bloody thirty-month-long civil war in the 60s, while on the second occasion it experienced a serious turbulence when, in 1990, some naïve and narrow-minded military officers attempted to violently overthrow the then federal military government, in the process of which they also announced the excision of some states with a particular ethno-religious population predominance, from Nigeria.

Though Nigeria managed to survive the turmoil on those two occasions and has indeed survived other similar, albeit relatively less serious, threats to its survival, the persistence of some organized seditious activities that persistently undermine its stability and, in fact, pose existential threat to it casts serious worries not only about the country’s prospect of achieving meaningful development, but also about its future as a sovereign political entity, for that matter. After all, the conflicting agendas of the sponsors and plotters of the rebellious activities perpetrated by various militant groups in the country highlight the extensiveness and intensity of the chaos that would certainly prevail should they manage to overthrow the institution of government in the country or any part thereof, God forbid.

The dynamics of creek militancy

Also published in Daily Trust

The large-scale and sustained crude oil and gas exploitation in the oil-rich Niger-Delta, and lack of adequate and effective environmental protection measures have undoubtedly affected the sub-region’s environmental quality hence the livelihood of millions of Nigerians out there who depend on subsistence fishing and farming, and who rightly lament the successive governments’ insensitivity towards their plight particularly over the past two decades.

Now that the change-oriented Buhari administration is confronted with the renewed challenge of violent militancy in the sub-region, which a new militant group calling itself Niger-Delta Avengers is currently conducting, there is a general expectation that, unlike what obtained in the past; the federal government would be seriously committed to solving the crisis this time around. Because, among other things, the persistence of such attacks on oil and gas infrastructure especially with the current increasing tempo, scale and intensity will certainly undermine and indeed frustrate whatever economic reforms the federal government is pursuing.

Reflections on subsidy debate

Also published in Daily Trust

The controversy that trailed the recent removal of oil subsidy triggered an interesting debate amongst Nigerians with divergent opinions on the issue. Nigerian economists, in particular, both the literalists who hardly see beyond the literal meanings of the economic theories they have learnt, and the pragmatists who supposedly view such theories in the context of Nigeria’s peculiar socio-economic circumstances, argued over its economic implications, advantages and disadvantages in the short, medium and long term. Likewise, other intellectuals in various academic fields and elsewhere, the barely educated, and even uneducated passionately expressed their views against or in favour of its removal. 

Being a free-for-all right from the start, the debate was unfortunately marred by rudeness and intolerance that characterized the approaches of many contributors especially on social media and other internet platforms where allegations and insults were traded. In fact, even some otherwise respected public commentators went to the extent of making insulting innuendoes against those holding contrary views on the issue.

Confessions and the question of conscience

Also published in Daily Trust

My column, titled ‘The politics of kayan aiki’ (Daily Trust, March 27, 2015) on the eve of the presidential election last year, dwelt on the flow of staggering amounts of kayan aiki (i.e. funds used to influence and manipulate election results) that literally flooded the country’s political scene during the campaign period. The sharing spree of kayan aiki at that time was simply too extravagant to elude even a casual observer. Also, due to the sheer amount of money involved, the beneficiaries ended up richer, of course according to the extent of their respective connections in the corridors of power and abilities to manipulate circumstances.  

Though election campaign in a capitalist-oriented political system e.g. Western-style democracy, necessarily, albeit unfortunately, entails spending huge amounts of money largely raised by individuals and vested interests, the situation in Nigeria is particularly unfortunate. Unlike elsewhere, election season in Nigeria is characterized by massive and systematic plundering of public treasury by the incumbent public office holders hell-bent on clinging to power at all cost. Their accomplices in the private sector also contribute individually and collectively to ensure the victory of their benefactors and partners in crime. For instance, the N23bn involved in the ongoing poll bribery scandal was part of such accomplices’ contributions from oil industry, to bribe Independent National Electoral commission (INEC) officials in order to tamper with the election result in favour of the incumbent president then. 

The plight of Dr. Afridi

Also published in Daily Trust

Five years ago, the United States’ Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) conducted one of its most audacious yet clandestine operations in which it killed Osama Bin Laden who was, until his death, the most wanted person in the world. Bin Laden was widely believed to be the mastermind behind some of the worst attacks that targeted the US interests within and outside the United States, e.g. the 1998 almost simultaneous terror bomb attacks on its embassies in Nairobi, Kenya, and Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, the 2000 bomb attack on its giant naval guided-missile destroyer, USS Cole, in Aden, Yemen, and, of course, the September 11, 2001 terror attacks in New York and Washington DC. 

The United States, therefore, had launched a global manhunt to capture or assassinate him, in the context of its controversial global war on terror, which it declared in the aftermath of the September 11, 2001 attacks in the wake of which it literally went berserk breaching the sovereignty of many countries, and actually invaded some others, witch-hunted organizations, persecuted and victimized individuals, in a blatant disregard for its own relevant laws and the applicable international laws, as well, under the pretext of counterterrorism. Its arrogant and megalomaniac former President, George W. Bush Jr, in whose tenure the September 11, 2001 attacks occurred was particularly reckless in this regard.